Daniel 7: 25 Commentary

WEARING OUT THE SAINTS OF GOD IN THE FALSE SYSTEMs

Some saints become aware of how they are being worn out by the false system. They note that despite the fact that they have tried their best& prayed to God their best for help, it seems they were going around in circles…going around in circles in the system set-up by the Mother Church while she rides the government on which she controls.

“Get out of her my people…that you should not share in her plagues” echoes in their mind as they begin to see the big pictures of things. And they knew that in the past believers have tried to flee from her and the Beast and its images …but after a while…they are overrun again…and the system they set-up to uphold the well being of the people are again corrupted and have turned into the image of the beast and the harlot bear rules again.

Only when majority of the people knows the Word of God well and their hearts is like that of David-a heart after God’s own heart, could the beast and the whore be defeated. As one song mournfully sings it: “They just can’t kill the beast!”

By TIUCHE (wrote 3262 Bible Commentaries - permalink to this Commentary)
Posted on: 1/2/2012 12:41 pm

WHAT DO MAJORITY OF THE WOMEN SEEK

Majority of women do not primarily seek after sex but belonging. To belong into a new home after the home they knew would disintegrate in the future. It is this primary needs which majority of our women seek and not sex. But the IDIOT WANTED TO DENY THIS from the daugthers and images of the first woman that he deceived. The IDIOT knew that from the seed of the woman will come and which had now come THE ONE DESTINED TO CRUSH HIS HEAD (Genesis 3:15). So to revenge himself of her and her kind, what did the IDIOT do? He thought to change the TIMES & LAWS OF GOD.

And viewing back from our year 2011 A.D. the IDIOT had already changed many of the Times & Laws of God. And one of the change the IDIOT made on the Laws of God was his LEVEL UP- raising up the Laws on Marriage. While God through the Holy Scriptures allowed men to have several wives, the IDIOT through his dupes had disallowed it. In fact God had Laws on plural marriages to regulate the practice, just one chapter from Ten Commandments chapter 20 of Exodus and in the rests of the sacred text. Here are just two laws:

Exodus 21:10 If he take him another wife, her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminished.

Deuteronomy 21:15 If a man have two wives, one beloved, and another hated, and they have born him children, both the beloved and the hated; and if the firstborn son be hers that …

In changing the Laws of God on marriage by disallowing plural marriage for men the excess of women are put in a dire situation where after their first home disintegrate they are destined to lived alone without a husband or children. Destined to live a cold and lonely life as a spinster. To adjust with this many women have opted either to adopt children or to become a single mom or even just lived among her relatives enduring the coldness and severity of the IDIOT tampering of the Laws of God on marriage!

In this the truthfulness of the scriptures echoes:

“…and he (THE IDIOT-THE PERVERT) shall wear out the saints of the most High and think to change times and laws:

And Jesus our Savior TELLS the dupes of the IDIOT:

Mark 7:13 Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition that you …
invalidating the word of God by your tradition which you have handed down; and you do many things such as that.”

Would the dupes see? Would even the Christian care? Would the majority of women think and see how the system created by men have doomed them into a life of coldness and loneliness? Oh that the FIRE OF GOD awaken you and let you help in turning the heart of the fathers to their children and the heart of the children to their fathers-think you might have missed the deeper meaning of this word!

By TIUCHE (wrote 3262 Bible Commentaries - permalink to this Commentary)
Posted on: 12/9/2011 19:42 pm

Why the Western World Uses an Awkward Calendar
source: http://www.ucg.org/news-and-prophecy/why-western-world-uses-awkward-calendar/

article by Paul Kieffer

Many have attempted to change the calendar in common use, due to peculiarities that complicate trade and commerce. Yet through all attempts to alter the calendar, God has seen to it that the seven-day week cycle was preserved.
In a memorandum to the United Nations in 1953, the Indian UN ambassador proposed the adoption of a new calendar to replace the Gregorian calendar, which is used worldwide to provide a common time reference for conducting business in today’s world. In explaining the reason for the proposal, the ambassador listed the facts that months, quarters and half years are of unequal lengths on the Gregorian calendar.
These factors skew business statistical analyses. And they can cause the number of working days in a given month to vary from year to year.
The ambassador wrote: “The greatest drawback from a statistical and commercial point of view is that, since the various days of the week are not of the same value as regards volume of trade, and the years and the months do not from year to year include the same number of individual weekdays, there can be no genuine statistical comparison between one year and another, while the various subdivisions of the year itself—the half years, quarters and months—are likewise incapable of comparison” (”Memorandum to the United Nations Economic and Social Council,” Document E/2514, Oct. 30, 1953).
Other criticisms of the Gregorian calendar include its adherence to a solar cycle, which produces a “unique” calendar from year to year. This means that a given date will vary from one year to the next: July 4 will be a weekday most years but can also fall on the weekend in some years. A given day of the month will not be the same weekday the next year, nor will a weekday in a given week of the year have the same calendar date as the previous year. Months and the year cannot be divided into an exact number of weeks. The exact reproduction of the calendar for any given year will take place only once every 28 years.
The asymmetrical Gregorian calendar, with its origins dating back to a prescientific age some 2,000 years ago, does seem to be an anachronism in today’s technological world. For decades, proponents of calendar reform have advocated the adoption of a new calendar.
The candidates are…
The League of Nations, following World War I, and the United Nations, after World War II, offered for the first time forums for discussion on worldwide societal change. Each organization received a proposal to replace the Gregorian calendar. Both calendars proposed had been developed in the mid-19th century and had a key similarity of special interest to Sabbath-keepers.
The older of the two calendars was a proposal for a 12-month scheme with identical quarters, presented by an Italian priest, Abbé Marco Mastrofini, in 1834. Mastrofini’s calendar is known today as the “World Calendar” or the “Universal Calendar.” It retains the 12 months used in the current Gregorian calendar, but all four quarters are always of equal length. Each quarter has three months, two of 30 days length and a third month of 31 days. Each quarter is exactly 13 weeks or 91 days long, beginning on Sunday and ending on Saturday. In addition, each month contains an equal number of 26 working days plus Sundays. The World Calendar has days and dates that always agree from year to year, and holidays are permanently fixed: The calendar remains identical from year to year.
The other calendar proposal was developed by Auguste Comte in 1849. Comte’s calendar was made up of 13 months of exactly 28 days each, or four full weeks. Comte’s calendar was adapted at the beginning of the 20th century to retain the names of the current months, with an additional 13th month, “Sol,” added during the summer season in the northern hemisphere. This calendar is known as the “International Fixed Calendar,” and it was promoted in the United States in the 1920s by George Eastman of Eastman Kodak fame, earning it the name “Eastman Calendar.”
The American public, however, did not warm up to Eastman’s calendar initiative because familiar dates would change. America’s birthday, the Fourth of July, would have become “Sol 17.” The only part of the Eastman calendar that would have been comparable to the current Gregorian calendar would have been the first 28 days of January.
The 13-month calendar was effectively killed when the League of Nations submitted only the World Calendar to member nations for an evaluation. This is the calendar promoted by the Indian ambassador to the United Nations in 1953.
However, at its 905th meeting on April 20, 1956, the UN Economic and Social Council adjourned discussion on calendar reform sine die (i.e., with no target date for future action). Since then, there has not been any further worldwide initiative to reform the Gregorian calendar.
Change would spell the end of the seven-day week
Both the “World Calendar” and the 13-month calendar had an annual cycle of exactly 364 days. However, the solar year is a little over a day longer than that. How were these two calendars to compensate for the difference?
To preserve the perennial nature with all dates always occurring on the same day of the week, both calendars provided for one extra “nameless day” at the end of the year. This day would have had a date, but no day of the week assigned to it. Every four years an additional “nameless day” would have been added at the end of another month, thus preserving the solar year, but also not disturbing the permanent correspondence between days of the week and calendar dates.
When Auguste Comte first proposed his 13-month calendar in 1849, he adopted the “nameless day” concept from Mastrofini’s World Calendar. Mastrofini was a Catholic priest, and his “nameless day” at the end of each year would have disrupted the seven-day week. Each year the real weekly cycle would have advanced one day—and in leap years by two days—relative to the calendar in use.
When the UN Economic and Social Council asked for input on India’s proposal to adopt the World Calendar, some delegations voiced concerns because of the undesirable effect it would have on certain aspects of religious life—the observance of a weekly day of rest in particular. Oddly enough, the Vatican did not comment on this aspect of the calendar proposal, although Catholic countries would have been influenced by any position taken by Rome.
The dominance of the Gregorian calendar
The influence of the Catholic Church was the initial impetus for the dominance of the Gregorian calendar. Its predecessor, the Julian calendar, dated back to the Roman Empire but was actually slightly longer than the solar year. As a result, by the 16th century the beginning of spring fell in early March.
To correct this problem, Pope Gregory XIII exercised his papal authority and excised 10 dates from the calendar by shortening October 1582. (The weekly cycle remained uninterrupted, however.) He also revised the leap-year rule by deciding that century-ending years would be leap years only if they were divisible by 400. (For example, the year 2000 was a leap year, but 1700, 1800 and 1900 were not.)
Catholic influence in Europe ensured that most European nations adopted the papal reform quickly. The rift between England and the Roman Church made England and its colonies an exception, but in 1752 they, too, adopted the Gregorian calendar when 11 dates were skipped to bring the British calendar into sync with the rest of Europe.
The French adopted a “Revolutionary Calendar” for about a dozen years in the 19th century, until Napoleon reestablished the Gregorian calendar in 1806. Russia and the ensuing Soviet Union converted to the Gregorian calendar in 1918, following the October Revolution a year earlier. The “October Revolution” actually took place in November 1917, according to the Gregorian calendar. In 1923 Greece adopted the Gregorian calendar, followed by Turkey in 1927.
Other calendars continue to be used for traditional or religious purposes, like the Chinese calendar or the “Revised Julian Calendar” used by the Eastern Orthodox churches. However, in practical application, the Gregorian calendar is the real world calendar, providing the basis for a common time reference for business transactions, etc.
Changing “times and laws”
Daniel’s prophecy of four wild beasts in Daniel 7 is a parallel prophecy to Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar’s dream in chapter 2. Both chapters describe the same four successive world kingdoms. The fourth beast of Daniel 7 is the same world kingdom represented by the legs and feet of the image seen by Nebuchadnezzar in his dream: the Roman Empire.
Daniel 7 provides an interesting description of this fourth beast: “The fourth beast will be a fourth kingdom on the earth, which will be different from all the other kingdoms, and it will devour the whole earth and tread it down and crush it. As for the ten horns, out of this kingdom ten kings will arise; and another will arise after them, and he will be different from the previous ones and will subdue three kings.
“And he will speak out against the Most High and wear down the saints of the Highest One, and he will intend to make alterations in times and in law; and they will be given into his hand for a time, times, and half a time” (verses 23-25, New American Standard Bible, emphasis added).
The power described as “another” in verse 24 appears to be involved in religious matters: It speaks out against God and persecutes true Christians. Since any civil government would be involved in normal legislation, this power would be distinguished by assuming ecclesiastical authority to alter “times” and “law.”
Rome was involved in changing “times” long before Pope Gregory XIII adjusted the Julian calendar in 1582. The most notable change was the introduction of the seven-day week as part of Rome’s acceptance of Christianity as a state-sanctioned religion. In A.D. 321, Emperor Constantine declared Sunday the first day of the seven-day week. (Although his purpose was to entrench Sunday worship, his calendar also inadvertently preserved the seven-day weekly cycle with the Sabbath as the seventh day of the week.)
With Constantine’s edict, the Roman Empire no longer persecuted this dominant form of Christianity. Instead, over time, Rome’s new state religion progressed to persecuting those Christians who did not agree with its teachings, and it continued the pattern established by Constantine of altering ecclesiastical “times” and “law.” Most notable is the well-documented transfer of the biblically enjoined day of rest from the seventh day of the week, the Sabbath, to Sunday.
Rome’s influence is the only authority that exists for observing Sunday, as is readily admitted by many scholars. “The Church changed the observance of the Sabbath to Sunday by right of the divine, infallible authority given to her by her founder, Jesus Christ. The Protestant claiming the Bible to be the only guide of faith has no warrant for observing Sunday. In this matter, the Seventh-Day Adventist is the only consistent Protestant” (”The Catholic Universe Bulletin,” Aug. 14, 1942, p. 4).
In 1975 Germany’s parliament, the Bundestag, established a new “German Industrial Standard” (DIN 1355) giving civil recognition to the Catholic week. Since 1976 calendars in Germany have been printed with the first day of the week as Monday and the seventh day as Sunday, Rome’s day of rest for a Christianity different from that practiced by the New Testament Church of God.
The ability to buy and sell
In Revelation 13 we find a prophecy with implications for the end time. In this chapter two beasts are depicted; one of them is a civil authority able “to make war with the saints and to overcome them” (Revelation:13:7), and the other masquerades “like a lamb,” but in reality speaks “like a dragon” (verse 11).
This second “beast” of Revelation 13 shares similarities with Daniel’s little horn of Daniel:7:23-25. It performs miracles (verses 13 and 14) and “exercises all the authority of the first beast” (verse 12). The second “beast” of Revelation 13 is obviously a religious power, since it has the appearance of a lamb and even works miracles, although in reality, it speaks like its actual source, Satan the devil!
In addition to forcing people to worship (a religious act) the first “beast” of Revelation 13, the second “beast” enforces a sign on the people who refuse to worship the first one: “He [the second beast] causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name” (Revelation:13:16-17).
The mark of the Beast will be some means of identifying people who are in submission to the authority of the Beast power. The language used—”right hand” (symbolic of actions or behavior) and “foreheads” (symbolic of mind or thoughts)—is identical to the description God gave His people Israel in the Old Testament to describe what His law should be to them (Exodus:13:9; Deuteronomy:6:8). Those who “worship the first beast” will therefore not be worshipping the true God, even though they will likely be deceived into believing that they are (John:16:1-2). Instead, they will be worshipping the Beast and following the Beast’s commands.
Of all the points of God’s basic spiritual law, the Ten Commandments, the one that is questioned or ignored most frequently is the commandment involving the Sabbath, which God intended to be a special sign for His people (Exodus:31:13). In fact, the Sabbath can be viewed as a test of a person’s willingness to be totally subject to God’s will for Christians. One sure way to prevent people from obeying God fully is to “alter times” by changing the calendar, as practiced throughout much of Europe and even achieved by civil legislation in Germany.
In the last 70 years, the Gregorian calendar remains the calendar of choice, simply because the religion of Rome, having altered the calendar centuries ago to suit its doctrines, seems unlikely to support any change that would do away with Sunday and the weekly cycle. WNP

By TIUCHE (wrote 3262 Bible Commentaries - permalink to this Commentary)
Posted on: 12/3/2011 15:24 pm

1. This 11th horn will speak blasphemously
a. Then he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme His name, His tabernacle, and those who dwell in heaven. It was granted to him to make war with the saints and to overcome them. And authority was given him over every tribe, tongue, and nation (Rev 13:6-7)
2. Listen to the pompous words spoken of Mussolini (Guzik)
a. “I believe in Rome Eternal, the Mother of my fatherland; and in Italy, her first born; who was born of her virgin womb by the grace of God; who suffered under the barbarian invader, was crucified, slain, and buried; who descended into the sepulcher, and rose from the dead in the nineteenth century; who ascended to heaven in her glory in 1918 and 1922 [by the march on Rome]; who is seated at the right hand of Mother Rome; who will come
thence to judge the quick and the dead; I believe in the genius of Mussolini; in our Holy Father, Fascism, and in the communion of its martyrs; in the conversion of the Italians; and in the resurrection of the Empire! Amen.” (from blueletterbible.org/commentaries)
3. This 11th horn will desire to change law and time
a. Perhaps replacing our Judeo-Christian principles
b. With those of more “humanist manifesto”
c. And replacing our current Gregorian calendar
d. With one similar to one after the French Revolution
e. Which was based on a 10-day week
4. The 11th horn will also persecute the saints for 3.5 years
a. So they worshiped the dragon who gave authority to the beast; and they worshiped the beast, saying, “Who is like the beast? Who is able to make war with him?” And he was given a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies, and he was given authority to continue for forty-two months (Rev 13:4-5)

By Tractorman (wrote 3574 Bible Commentaries - permalink to this Commentary)
Posted on: 12/1/2011 14:04 pm

BIG TIME NEGOTIATORS/ MERCHANTS TWEAKING TINGS TO FORM THE NEW WORLD ORDER- and most are unaware of it even the highly literate Americans!

A Very Real New World Order
BY Chuck Baldwin
SOURCE: http://bereanbiblechurch.in/articles/list/19
January 27, 2009

It is hard to believe, but a majority of Americans (including Christians and conservatives) seem oblivious to the fact that there is a very real, very legitimate New World Order (NWO) unfolding. In the face of overwhelming evidence, most Americans not only seem totally unaware of this reality, they seem unwilling to even remotely entertain the notion.

On one hand, it is understandable that so many Americans would be ignorant of the emerging New World Order. After all, the mainstream media refuses to report, or even acknowledge, the NWO. Even “conservative” commentators and talk show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, or Joe Scarborough refuse to discuss it. And when listeners call these respective programs, these “conservative” hosts usually resort to insulting the caller as being some kind of “conspiracy kook.” One host even railed that if anyone questions the government line on 9/11, we should “lock them up and throw away the key.” So much for freedom of speech!

This is an area–perhaps the central area–where liberals and conservatives agree: they both show no patience or tolerance for anyone who believes that global government (in any form) is evolving. One has to wonder how otherwise intelligent and thoughtful people can be so brain dead when it comes to this issue. It makes one wonder who is really pulling their strings, doesn’t it?

The list of notable personalities who have openly referenced or called for some kind of global government or New World Order is extremely lengthy. Are all these people “kooks” or “conspiracy nuts”? Why would world leaders–including presidents, secretaries of state, and high government officials; including the media, financial, and political elite–constantly refer to something that doesn’t exist? Why would they write about, talk about, or openly promote a New World Order, if there is no such thing?

Many of us recall President George Herbert Walker Bush talking much about an emerging New World Order. For example, in 1989, Bush told the students of Texas A&M University, “Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a family of nations.”

Later, Bush, Sr. said, “We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order . . .. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders.”

Bush, Sr. also said, “What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea–a new world order.”

Bush, Sr. further said, “The world can therefore seize the opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order . . .”

What was President G.H.W. Bush talking about, if there is no such thing as an emerging New World Order? Was he talking out of his mind? Was he hallucinating?

England’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair, said, “We are all internationalists now, whether we like it or not.” He continued saying, “On the eve of a new Millennium we are now in a new world. We need new rules for international co-operation and new ways of organizing our international institutions.” He also said, “Today the impulse towards interdependence is immeasurably greater. We are witnessing the beginnings of a new doctrine of international community.”

In 1999, Tony Blair said, “Globalization has transformed our economies and our working practices. But globalism is not just economic. It is also a political and security phenomenon.”

What is Tony Blair talking about, if there is no emerging New World Order? What does he mean by “a new doctrine of international community”? What does he mean by “new world”? How can one have globalism, which includes “a political and security phenomenon,” without creating a New World Order? Is Tony Blair hallucinating?

Likewise, former President George W. Bush penned his signature to the Declaration of Quebec back on April 22, 2001, in which he gave a “commitment to hemispheric integration and national and collective responsibility for improving the economic well-being and security of our people.”

By “our people,” Bush meant the people of the Western Hemisphere, not the people of the United States. Phyllis Schlafly rightly reminded us that G.W. Bush “pledged that the United States will ‘build a hemispheric family on the basis of a more just and democratic international order.’”

Remember, too, that it was G.W. Bush who, back in 2005, committed the United States to the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), which is nothing more than a precursor to the North American Community or Union, as outlined in CFR member Robert Pastor’s manual, “Toward a North American Community.”

If there is no such thing as an emerging New World Order, what was G.W. Bush talking about when he referred to “a hemispheric family” and an “international order”?

The public statements of notable world leaders regarding an emerging New World Order are copious. Consider the statements of former CBS newsman, Walter Cronkite.

In his book, “A Reporter’s Life,” Walter Cronkite said, “A system of world order–preferably a system of world government–is mandatory. The proud nations someday will see the light and, for the common good and their own survival, yield up their precious sovereignty . . .” Cronkite told BBC newsman Tim Sebastian, “I think we are realizing that we are going to have to have an international rule of law.” He added, “We need not only an executive to make international law, but we need the military forces to enforce that law.” Cronkite also said, “American people are going to begin to realize that perhaps they are going to have to yield some sovereignty to an international body to enforce world law.”

If there is no emerging New World Order, what is Walter Cronkite talking about? Can there be any doubt that Cronkite is talking about global government? Absolutely not!

Now, when Bush, Sr. talks about fulfilling “the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders,” he was talking about the same thing former UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali was talking about when he said, “The time for absolute and exclusive sovereignty . . . has passed.”

The United Nations has been on the forefront of promoting the New World Order agenda since its very inception. In 1995, the UN released a manual entitled, “Our Global Neighborhood.” It states, “Population, consumption, technology, development, and the environment are linked in complex relationships that bear closely on human welfare in the global neighborhood. Their effective and equitable management calls for a systematic, long-term, global approach guided by the principle of sustainable development, which has been the central lesson from the mounting ecological dangers of recent times. Its universal application is a priority among the tasks of global governance.”

If there is no emerging New World Order, what is “global governance” all about?

“Who are the movers and shakers promoting global government?” you ask. Obviously, it is the international bankers who are the heavyweights behind the push for global government. Remember, one cannot create a “global economy” without a global government to manage, oversee, and control it.

In a letter written to Colonel E. Mandell House, President Franklin D. Roosevelt said, “The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson.”

“Old Hickory” did his best to rid the United States from the death grip that the international bankers were beginning to exert on this country. He may have been the last President to actually oppose the bankers. In discussing the Bank Renewal bill with a delegation of bankers in 1832, Jackson said, “Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time, and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families.That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the eternal God, I will rout you out.”

Unfortunately, the international bankers proved themselves to be too formidable for President Jackson. And in 1913, with the collaboration of President Woodrow Wilson, the bankers were given charge over America’sfinancial system by the creation of the Federal Reserve.

Ever since the CFR and Trilateral Commission were created, they have filled the key leadership positions of government, big media, and of course, the Federal Reserve.

In his book, “With No Apologies,” former Republican Presidential nominee Barry Goldwater wrote, “The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power– political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future.” Was Goldwater a prophet or what?

And again, the goals of the global elite have been publicly stated. Back in 1991, the founder of the CFR, David Rockefeller praised the major media for their complicity in helping to facilitate the globalist agenda by saying, “We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. . . . It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

How could Rockefeller be any plainer? He acknowledged the willful assistance of the major media in helping to keep the elitists’ agenda of global government from the American people. To this day, the major media has not deviated from that collaboration. And this includes the aforementioned “conservative” talking heads. They know if they want to keep their jobs, they dare not reveal the New World Order. The NWO, more than anything else, is the “Third Rail” to the national media.

Is it any wonder that President Barack Obama has stacked his government with numerous members of the CFR? Among these are Robert Gates, Janet Napolitano, Eric Shinseki, Timothy Geithner, and Tom Daschle. Other CFR members include CFR President Richard Haass, CFR Director Richard Holbrooke, and founding member of the Trilateral Commission and CFR member Paul Volcker. Obama even asked a CFR member, Rick Warren, to deliver the inaugural prayer.

Still not convinced? Just a few days ago, when asked by a reporter what he thought the most important thing was that Barack Obama could accomplish, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said, “I think his task will be develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a New World Order can be created. It’s a great opportunity; it isn’t just a crisis.”

This is the same Henry Kissinger, you will recall, who said back in 1991, “Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were [sic] an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”

Even Gideon Rachman, the chief foreign affairs commentator for the Financial Times, wrote an editorial expressing his support for world government. In his column he said, “I have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the US. . . . But, for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.

“A ‘world government’ would involve much more than co-operation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.

“So could the European model go global? There are three reasons for thinking that it might.”

Rachman then goes on to explain the reasons why he believes world government is plausible.

Do you now see why it does not matter to a tinker’s dam whether it is a Republican or Democrat who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue? For the most part, both major parties in Washington, D.C., have been under the dominating influence of the international bankers who control the Federal Reserve, the CFR, and the Trilateral Commission. And this is also why it does not matter whether one calls himself conservative or liberal. For the most part, both conservatives and liberals in Washington, D.C., are facilitating the emerging New World Order. It is time we wake up to this reality.

Presidents Bush, Sr., Bill Clinton, and Bush, Jr. have thoroughly set the table for the implementation of the NWO, as surely as the sun rises in the east. All Obama has to do is put the food on the table–and you can count on this: Barack Obama will serve up a New World Order feast like you cannot believe!

That a New World Order is emerging is not in question. The only question is, What will freedom-loving Americans do about it? Of course, the first thing they have to do is admit that an emerging New World Order exists! Until conservatives, Christians, pastors, constitutionalists, and others who care about a sovereign, independent United States acknowledge the reality of an emerging New World Order, they will be incapable of opposing it. And right now, that is exactly what they are not doing.

This column is archived at
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20090127.html

By TIUCHE (wrote 3262 Bible Commentaries - permalink to this Commentary)
Posted on: 7/17/2011 14:29 pm

TWEAKING THE MAN MADE LAWS & IGNORING GOD LAWS ON WHAT IS RIGHT TO ACHIEVE RESURRECTION POWER

EU Constitution Kingpin: We Will Ignore Referendums

Admits Lisbon Treaty was intended to confuse public into acceptance
Steve Watson & Paul Watson / Infowars.net | Friday, June 27, 2008

Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, author of the rejected European Constitution, has effectively stated that the votes of citizens in EU member states will have no bearing on the future actions of the European Parliament.
The former President of France has told media that referendums, such as last week’s key Irish vote on the Lisbon Treaty, will simply be ignored by bureaucrats in Brussels as they may hinder the progress of European integration.
A London Telegraph report detailed the EU kingpin’s comments:
“We are evolving towards majority voting because if we stay with unanimity, we will do nothing,” he said.
“It is impossible to function by unanimity with 27 members. This time it’s Ireland; the next time it will be somebody else.”
“Ireland is one per cent of the EU”.

d’Estaing also told the Irish Times that after the rejection of the original EU Constitution in 2005 by Dutch and French voters, The Lisbon Treaty was a deliberate attempt to repackage the constitution in a more confusing format.
“What was done in the [Lisbon] Treaty, and deliberately, was to mix everything up. If you look for the passages on institutions, they’re in different places, on different pages,” he said.
“Someone who wanted to understand how the thing worked could with the Constitutional Treaty, but not with this one.”
What kind of parliament completely ignores the will of the people, sets out to intentionally confuse the public into accepting legislation, flouts its own laws, and does whatever it wants without accountability?
The only reason the Irish were even allowed a referendum in the first place was due to the fact that Ireland’s national constitution mandates that any amendment must be put to a vote, the country remained the only bulwark against the EU’s final stumbling block to creating a federal superstate and completely eliminating all remaining vestiges of sovereignty. Other countries, including Great Britain were simply denied a national vote altogether.Under EU laws, if one of its member states rejects a treaty, the EU is mandated to scrap the bill. But the European Union’s contempt for direct democracy is likely to lead them to ignore the Irish referendum and pursue the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty anyway – underscoring the fact that the EU is nothing more than an illegitimate autocracy of manufactured consent.
The usual tactic of the EU is simply to keep repeating a referendum until they achieve the result they desire.
In 2001 the Irish voted No to the Nice Treaty and were simply asked to vote again a year later. That time they said Yes. In 1992 Denmark voted No to the Maastricht Treaty – and voted Yes a year later. The French and Dutch rejected the constitution in 2005 and the EU architects designed the Lisbon Treaty instead.
But this time the EU is set to go a step further and simply ignore the decision of the Irish people and the will of any future dissenting members, while breaking their own laws – proving once and for all that the body is completely illegitimate, dangerous to democracy and a de-facto federal dictatorship.
Related: Former Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovksy’s grave warning over the EU
WATCH ALEX JONES’ ENDGAME ONLINE NOW in its entirety. View more High quality trailers at www.endgamethemovie.com

sOURCE: http://www.infowars.com/eu-constitution-kingpin-we-will-ignore-referendums/

By TIUCHE (wrote 3262 Bible Commentaries - permalink to this Commentary)
Posted on: 7/4/2011 12:29 pm

Jono:
I live in the Philippines, Asia.

By TIUCHE (wrote 3262 Bible Commentaries - permalink to this Commentary)
Posted on: 6/30/2011 12:04 pm

Tiuche, yes I meant you own name. Of course you don’t have to reveal your whole identity, but do you live in China or in one of the many countries where Chinese settled in the past?

Thanks a lot for answering my question. I learned something today!

By jono (wrote 4 Bible Commentaries - permalink to this Commentary)
Posted on: 6/29/2011 17:28 pm

Jono:
Source of the post below is www.yashanet.com/library/hebrew-days-and-months.html.

Hebrew Weekdays

Except for the Sabbath day, the individual days of the week have no names, just numbers. The middle column in the table below gives the actual transliterated pronunciation of the names. Yom is pronounced “Yome”. The “Kh” is a guttural sound often spelled as “Ch”. There is no “Ch” sound in Hebrew as there is in English. Modern Hebrew, however, can create a “Ch” sound by putting an accent mark ( ´ ) in front of the Hebrew letter “Khet” (or “Chet”). This is used only in rare cases in order to properly pronounce such words or names as Church or Churchill (referring to the person Winston Churchill.)

Secular Weekday Name Hebrew “Name” Hebrew Meaning

Sunday Yom Reeshone First day
Monday Yom Shaynee Second day
Tuesday Yom Shlee´shee Third day
Wednesday Yom Revee´ee Fourth day
Thursday Yom Khah´mee´shee Fifth day
Friday Yom Ha´shee´shee Sixth day
Saturday Shabbat Rest

And regarding your question” where does that name come from/” I understand this to mean you mean my name” TIUCHE”….this is my chinese name which i shortened. My chinese name is TIU HUA CHE meaning ONE(tiu) WISE(hua) FOUNDATION(che). My father gave this name to me.

By TIUCHE (wrote 3262 Bible Commentaries - permalink to this Commentary)
Posted on: 6/28/2011 11:32 am

Tiuche [where does that name come from BTW], it’s interesting what you reveal here about the days of the week. I know the Bible says the week has 7 days and that the 7th day is named Sabbath, but do you or someone else posting here know the Hebrew names of the other days?

By jono (wrote 4 Bible Commentaries - permalink to this Commentary)
Posted on: 6/27/2011 14:37 pm

TWEAKING THE WEEKS & START OF THE DAY

The names of the week originally came from the Greeks and the Romans, who named the days of the week after their gods.The descendants of the English People the anglo-saxons adopted that idea and substituted the names of their gods.

Sunday -Day of the Sun
Monday -Day of the Moon
Tuesday-Day of Tiu
Wednesday- Day of Woden or Odin
Thursday- Day of Thor
Friday- Day of Freya
Saturday- Day of Saturn

sources of the names of the week: www.crowl.org/Lawrence/time/days.html

The 7th Day of the week is Saturday which is supposed to start at sunset Friday, about 6:01P.M.-the start of the 1st hour till sunrise Saturday about 5:59 a.m.-the 12th hour of the night…but somebody moved the start of the day at 12:01 a.m.calling it twelve in the morning but at the same time calling it MIDNIGHT!

And now according to International Standard ISO 8601 Sunday is the 7th and last Day of the week…while the Hebrew Calendar, traditional Christian Calendars and Muslim calendar Saturday is the 7th & last day of the week.

Who you gonna believe? Me i’ll put my wager that the Hebrew/Jewish Calendar is right since they were the Oracle holders…

Did they tweak the weeks & start of the day in order to improve it or to confuse? Was it a good plan or one that God warns the anti christ will think and do?

We note that men are fun of changing what God had set as a Law…They CHANGE the start of the day, the 7th day, the months, the Biblical Patriarchal System , polygyny. And now they are even tampering the genes…and we donot know what else they will tamper with in the future.

Would men because of their disobedience shoot their own feet? They will shoot their ownselves with the greatest time of trouble that will happen sometimes in the future!

By TIUCHE (wrote 3262 Bible Commentaries - permalink to this Commentary)
Posted on: 6/27/2011 13:39 pm

Dan.7:25 The subject there is who[the imperor constantine the great is the one who made a decree on march 07,321 AD that sunday is an offecial holiday or lords day instead of saturday,but you may read from gen.to rev.there is no single line authorizing that sunday is the seventh day or sabbath.recorded in convert cathecism and catholic doctrine.

By sam (wrote 1 Bible Commentary - permalink to this Commentary)
Posted on: 4/14/2011 19:24 pm

Who is he that had spoken or shall speak against the most high? What times and laws had he thought to change or of which he had already succeeded in changing? Enemy spotted…I have seen the enemy said a cartoon character…the enemy I see wears a cloak of decency sang Bob Dylan….

1). Everybody think that September is the 9th month, right? October to December as the 10th to the 12th month. But would you know that September (septa, siete) is the 7th month? Would you know that October, November and December are the 8th (Octo), 9th (Noeve) and 10th (Diesciembre) months? Why?

2). Everybody thinks that Sunday is the 7th day…but would you believe it is the 1st day of the week and that Friday evening to Saturday Evening is the 7th day? Why?

3). Everybody thinks that a day starts at 12 a.m. and ends in 12 p.m ….but think..12 a.m. is it midnight or morning? Is 12 p.m. afternoon or midmorning? Are we not confuse? 12 a.m. described as it is 12 in the morning when it is midnight halfway between the sunset(more or less 6p.m.) and the sunrise(more or less 6 a.m.). With the ancient is wisdom says the scriptures….in the past a day start sunset (6 p.m. ) and ends and start again sunset (6 p.m.). Someone moved it 6 hours later (12 pm/am). Why?

4). God gave Israel Seven (7) Feasts of His Kingdom…we are told to seek His Kingdom and rigtheousness…these seven (7) Feasts were shadows of things to come…they were blueprints for the future of our kind. Anybody hear of them today? No?
One of the Feast which is the 1st Feast is celebrated by Catholics and Protestants which they termed as the Lord Supper. But the rests of the Feasts they discarded thinking they were for the Jews. How could you celebrate the 1st Feast which was the first Step and then disregard the rest of the Steps? In fact St. Paul advised New Testament believers to celebrate 2nd Feasts in 1 Corinthian 5:8 after the 1st Feast (verse 7).

5). Then on marriage a BIG BIG LIE was made making drunk and deceiving billions of people to follow after the Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the earth (Revelation 17).

By TIUCHE (wrote 51 Bible Commentaries - permalink to this Commentary)
Posted on: 4/14/2011 16:12 pm